Editorial policy

Radiant Civic Review aims to make civic design easier to see and discuss. We distinguish description from opinion, take care with factual claims and say plainly when an example or interpretation has limits.

Accuracy and context

We check names, dates and other factual details against suitable material before publication and avoid presenting a single example as proof of a universal rule. When a point is uncertain, we say so. Our writing is editorial, not official guidance about public services, access requirements or local rules.

Independence and partnerships

Editorial choices remain separate from commercial arrangements. Paid, supplied or partner material is labelled clearly so readers can tell what it is. A partnership does not guarantee favourable coverage, and we do not disguise promotional copy as independent editorial work.

Corrections and illustrations

If a published detail is wrong, readers can send a correction through the Contact page. We review clear, specific reports and amend material when warranted. Some illustrations may be generated with AI; where used, they are identified as illustrations and are not presented as documentary images.